A scathing, withering review of the first four (screener) episodes by Maureen “Mo” Ryan and someotherguynamed Ryan:
Talking TV with Ryan and Ryan: Episode 168: Jessica’s Castle Expanse 11/18
Once upon a time, Maureen Ryan, then of the Chicago Tribune, was the critic darling of the Battlestar Galactica production. I always considered her a friend of the show. Then her and Hit Fix’s Alan Sepinwall watched a three episode screener of Caprica season 1.5. They tag team hated it and triumphantly declared they would not watch the rest of Caprica. I thought they were fickle and almost irresponsible, egging as they were for Caprica’s audience to stop watching the show. And this was in the context of Caprica stopping production at mid-season hiatus, hiring a new show runner, retooling the show, and trying to come back swinging. I felt like they made a concerted effort, together, to sabotage the show.
Here, she gives The Expanse a gracious two more episodes to totally change her mind or she’s not watching the rest of The Expanse either. Just like days before the premiere of Caprica season 1.5, she’s sniping at The Expanse days before the public has its first chance to watch it. To be fair, she hails back to a newspaper columnist critic era that believes they have an obligation to their readership to helpfully suggest what entertainment offerings can safely be bypassed altogether. So in her mind, in this day and golden age of way too much television, she is continuing to provide an invaluable service. Watch that show but don’t watch this show. Or she’s an ambitious demagogue that hopped from The Trib’s TV critic, to AOL’s TV critic, to Variety’s latest critic. See, now I’m name calling.
First up, selected barbs from someotherguynamed Ryan, the minority voice during the fifteen minute review:
Basically my review of the expanse is go watch Killjoys. (Steven Strait) looks like the love child of Jay Berenchal and James Franco. I’m trying to be nice. There’s nothing much to really recommend. I think there’s enough of a track record of you and I talking about sci-fi that long time listeners can have a good assessment of the show before they see it and decide if they want to watch it for themselves.
He’s basically asking readers/isteners to trust his judgement without stating many reasons while letting Maureen pull the real weight of the review.
Maureen is more specific in her subjective impressions as to how the show instilled confusion and apathy in her. She describes The Expanse as attempting to be both Killjoys (funny and fun to watch) and Battlestar Galactica (issues driven drama) and failing.
This show feels like its trying to do both of that and its kind of falling between the stools and I think in large part because a lot of things happen, and things are being told to me, and what I should know about, and pay attention to and what matters and where it’s happening and why. It’s a little hard to follow. It’s kind of not laid out in a way that feels elegant or intriguing. And then I don’t necessarily care who those things are happening to.
…it’s really not character driven and I think these were based on a series of books and I have not read the books. Specifically I think I’ve heard of them but I have not read them in part because this show was coming and I hate the comparison thing in my head…
I gotta tell you, I’m really sick of the whole everything is blue and black in space…
Last September, Variety hired Maureen to become their new co-chief television critic. She’s writing Variety’s review of The Expanse right now.
ADD: Variety: TV Review: ‘The Expanse’ 11/23