Of course not. I’m collecting pictures for the day I’ll be stepping over THE LINE.
What’s the point of wearing panties over a string?
I have no idea. I was staring at that part for like an hour, trying to figure out the reason. Yeah… that’s why… let’s go with that.
You raise an interesting philosophical, mathamological point.
Do two pictures of a half-naked girl equal one full naked girl?
Would you rather have two half-naked or one fully naked girl in your bunk?
And what kind of word is “mathamological”??
Censorship. Once again proving why it’s bad. BAAADDDD!!!
I had hoped that gainful employment might cut down on GR’s guttertime, so we might not have to be subjected to posts containing word combinations like “Schwarzenegger penis” (unless, of course, you’re actually talking about the Governator and are in search of an appropriate epithet)
where’s that brain scrubber, anyway?
Which has, in fact, happened. But hey, I’m enjoying my weekend!
Well, half-nakedness of pictures are geometrically summed (multiplied):
1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4
Therefore, having two half-naked pictures is equivalent to having a 3/4 naked picture.
Note that infinite geometric series of 1/2 does NOT equal zero:
1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * . . . * 1/2 != 0
This shows that no matter how many half-naked pictures you have, it’s not the same as having just one fully naked picture.
It’s a perfectly cromulent word.
Continuing the train of sexy David Boreanaz pics …
Not quite. See below.
I’m not sure I agree with your mathamology there.
2 * ( (c + n) / 2) = c + n
where c = clothed and n = naked
Therefore, two half-naked girls equal one naked girl and one clothed girl.
shh, don’t embiggen his head any more that it already is!
Since the Schlonginator was mentioned repeatedly during the Terminator podcasts, obviously that’s now an officially permissible topic. 
Actually, there’s nothing wrong with your mathamology. This is how you interpret the result:
“Therefore, two half-naked girls equal one naked girl and one clothed girl.” - What this result implies is that whenever there are pictures of two half naked girls, you will inevitably be fixated with the hotter one. (And trust me, there’s always “the hotter one”.*) Once that happens, well, the other one may as well be fully clothed, because you’re not looking at her any way.
- There’s the notable except to this rule: Albert Einstein’s famous “Pictures of Hot Half-naked Twins” experiment. We still don’t know how to interpret the results of this experiment, as the scientists all immediately went into their bunks, never to return.)
my thinking exactly. By the way, I went back and checked that scene in T1 after it got mentioned in the podcast.
I’m eating peaches!!
Oh, noez. You leave her alone!
Ain’t that juicy!?
I’m surprised that so many people never noticed it before. I remember noticing some movement when I first watched it on VHS, but the DVD pretty much removes all doubt. It’s probably pretty scary in HD. 
And how does that work with a mirror image?
- There’s the notable except to this rule: Albert Einstein’s famous “Pictures of Hot Half-naked Twins” experiment. We still don’t know how to interpret the results of this experiment, as the scientists all immediately went into their bunks, never to return.)
How could you forget about Schrödinger’s famous experiment with the girl in the box? It was unknown whether she was clothed or naked, and so she existed in a state of flux where she was simultaneously both naked and clothed, until the box was opened and she could be observed.