I remember reading that site several years ago… some of the points he (?) makes are valid, but they are presented in such an antagonistic way that he ultimately undermines himself. While the discussion of racism is interesting, most of his examples appear to be more about cultural relativism than racism as it’s understood in the US today.
Example: the discussions/controversies about girls wearing hijab to school in France. French government says no way, you’re here and you can’t wear that (what the writer would see as “non-racist”); some Muslim women and girls protest that the government is constricting their rights and prohibiting them from practicing their religion, preserving their culture. And of course this is wrapped up in issues of immigration, women’s rights, “modernity” and “progress,” all of which complicate the scenario.
All of it’s more complicated than right and wrong - living in our society imbues in each of us cultural attitudes that are there and hard to unlearn. We are all racist, in some degree. However, calling someone or something inherently racist doesn’t help an anti-racist agenda (I admit that I’m just as guilty of slipping back into that mode of discourse, try though I might to focus on actions and attitudes rather than selfhood), particularly since we all are. Fiction necessarily reflects the culture in which it is produced, as well as the culture of the individual (or group) that produces it. Focusing on attitudes, beliefs, and actions as opposed to impunging selfhood with a label that all but few view as negative allows for a more productive conversation on the issue.
Short version: interesting, but in my view lacks nuance.
(I really should get back to working on my dissertation :p)