Some of you guys make me feel old.
From the time I could read I was into sci-fi. Some of my earliest memories were Clarke, Asimov, Bradbury, Heinlein, Verne, Wells. The classics. All while still at primary school.
And to go with the sci-fi, Clarke and Asimov in particular wrote lots of hard science. I guess this grounding always gave me a critical eye when it came to viewing sci-fi on the big and small screens.
The cheesy 50’s monster/sci-fi movies left me cold (and still do despite them seeming to be rather cool to many people now).
2001: A Space Odyssey was definitive, the standard against which I have measured every sci-fi film or TV show since.
Star Wars I regarded as a western in space, pretty much how I first viewed Trek. (I only saw Trek a decade or more after first release. No cable in Aust in those days.)
I have seen very few good quality sci-fi big screen movies in recent years. Close Encounters, Blade Runner, Gattaca, Sunshine stand out perhaps.
On TV, British sci-fi dominated: Dr Who (silly, but fun), Blake’s Seven (cheap, but that whole dominatrix-Servalan-thing…grrrrr…), UFO (outstanding), Space 1999 (craaaaap, but the chicks were hot), Omega Factor (real scary, proto-X-Files), and later Hitchhiker’s Guide, Red Dwarf.
The earlier US-created series were excruciating: Lost in Space (No damn kids, OK?), Buck Rogers (no cute robots, OK?), Battlestar Galactica (appalling - no cute robots or kids, OK?), Six Million Dollar Man.
But higher production values and better stories came around with the Treks, X-Files, Babylon 5, Whedon’s stuff.
BSG pretty much stands out. The characters are more real, the ‘sci-fi’ elements pushed further into the background. In X-Files what mattered was not aliens or government conspiracies, or paranormal stuff, but Mulder and Scully, and their characters and reactions. In BSG, it is Tigh, it is Tyrol, Roslin, and so many others. Love them, hate them, care for them. I see BSG as carrying on the ‘story arc’ concept from B5, but creating more real, more human characters.