For the record though…if it could just be shipped directly to me on Anders, that would be great…
I’ll be in my bunk…
IYKWIM X 2 :)
Only if you wear the Tigh eyepatch and turn off the CCTV. :eek:
“I finally got to Earth and all I got was this frakking t-shirt”
Like this one
Awesome. I just bought the blue Larry’s Landscaping t-shirt. Can’t wait to get it!
Sean, how about…
ERF.
?
Ok, so I put a new one up and have several more to follow soon. Hope you guys dig it
~Sean
Hilariousness…
Sean… I’m down on my knees begging you to please please please please put up a shirt with Chuck’s “Bow Chicka Voo Voo” on it.
Betcha I can get others to back me on this one…
So totally on the “Yes” bandwagon for this one!
IYKWIM! (sorry, couldn’t be helped.)
begging you to please please please please put up a shirt with Chuck’s “Bow Chicka Voo Voo” on it.
Betcha I can get others to back me on this one…
Thirded!
Frakking Awesome! Man - I’m going to have to start putting this stuff on the birthday list otherwise I’m going to be completely broke! :eek:
Hey… if that’s what it takes to get that on a shirt…it can be negotiated.
No comment. 
I thought perhaps the glowing spine might work. I threw together a design in about five minutes just to give an idea. I couldn’t exactly get a great glow effect going, but I’m going to work with it more.
It’s graphically nice and it may even pass an IP muster.
Take a look:
I would buy that shirt in a heartbeat.
Dude…you need a callsign…bad. What about Digits, since there are so many in you username?
. . . might actually work as a shirt.
From Wikipedia:
Fair use and parody
Producers or creators of parodies of a copyrighted work have been sued for infringement by the targets of their ridicule, even though such use may be protected as fair use. The fair use cases addressing parodies distinguish between parodies—using a work in order to poke fun at or comment on the work itself—and satires—using a work to poke fun at or comment on something else. Courts have been more willing to grant fair use protections to parodies than to satires, but the ultimate outcome in either circumstance will turn on the application of the four fair use factors.
In Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.[15] the Supreme Court recognized parody as a fair use, even when done for profit. Roy Orbison’s publisher, Acuff-Rose Music Inc., had sued 2 Live Crew in 1989 for their use of Orbison’s “Oh, Pretty Woman” in a mocking rap version with altered lyrics. The Supreme Court viewed 2 Live Crew’s version as a ridiculing commentary on the earlier work, and ruled that when the parody was itself the product rather than used for mere advertising, commercial sale did not bar the defense. The Campbell court also distinguished parodies from satire, which they described as a broader social critique not intrinsically tied to ridicule of a specific work, and so not deserving of the same use exceptions as parody because the satirist’s ideas are capable of expression without the use of the other particular work.
A number of appellate decisions have recognized parody as a protected fair use, including both the Second (Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp.) and Ninth Circuits (Mattel v. Walking Mountain Productions). Most recently, Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin, a suit was brought unsuccessfully against the publication of The Wind Done Gone, which reused many of the characters and situations from Gone with the Wind, but told the events from the point of view of the slaves rather than the slaveholders. The Eleventh Circuit, applying Campbell, recognized that The Wind Done Gone was a protected parody, and vacated the district court’s injunction against its publication.
“H1” has been my call sign elsewhere. . .
How about Magnum?
Yeah, you know how he paid for that Ferrari? By NEVER PAYING ME RENT EVER. Ex-Navy Seal indeed!