Interesting article from Mo Ryan. I have to say I agree with her for the most part - there are bits of interesting things in SGU, but not enough for a whole story, and the characters(male OR female) evoke very little at best. Which I do hope changes soon. And it might, since it’s still early. As for the sexism, my feeling is that the SG franchise is a teeny tiny bit sexist anyway (but I’m distracted by the kickass stories in SG1), so this is the least of SGU’s problems. The stories are a bit boring, the characters even duller, even with the gratuitous sex scene.
Now, I’m a total newbie at SG (on top of SGU, still watching old SG1 seasons right now, and haven’t even started on SGA), so while I don’t come with the baggage (of how great this shows should be), I also don’t have all the infomation of the past either.But I feel that I’m not a stupid viewer (well, not THAT stupid anyway :D), and after reading the article, I think I feel worse about the attitude of the producer than the show itself. Sure, he is (rightfully) defending his own show, but also (wrongfully) slamming another show that had barely two episodes out. You can’t complain about other people slamming your show if you’re doing the exact thing to another new show based on two episodes. That and the “you don’t like it because you don’t understand it” is practically begging me to cut the show out. Shades of Kring, and me? No likey.