GWC at the Movies

Three movies in one day-

Haywire:

No flashy cars or exotic locations, no nifty high tech gadgets or blinged-out weapons. It is just a well thought out and believable spy-like thriller. The filming is just as straightforward as the story and action. The direction at the beginning had me worried because the initial action sequence was very heavy handed and the editing seemed to have been done by someone suffering from ADD, But fortunately things mellowed out after that. In fact things relaxed so much that you felt more like a voyeur than a viewer, which was a nice change. Having sequences seeming ‘staged’ can pull you out of a film. Here events appeared to happen and it took me awhile to catch on as to why. Clever camera angles and tight framing restricts your view and you literally discover things as the protagonist does, no wide dramatic shots or heavy foreshadowing here. It adds to the tension and sense of chaos. Nicely done…

I was very impressed by the fight sequences, they were not choreographed for the cinema. But rather to be brutal and authentic to the training an independent contractor would have. It was mostly Krav Maga, which is excellent for close quarters combat. And you will watch this and wholeheartedly believe that the woman is capable of taking these men down. Because unlike Black Widow using silly pro-wrestling moves, this woman uses leverage, grappling and joint locks to remove the man’s mass and strength advantage.

And Ewan McGregor makes such a convincing douche bag (gee I wonder why? :rolleyes:)… I very much enjoyed this film.

Sherlock Holmes 2:

More of the same magic as the first. The cast has good chemistry and I enjoyed seeing Noomi in an American film, I thought she did quite well. Moriarty is played by another actor but it did not seem to effect anything. They tried to balance out the action with detective work, inventiveness and apparent madness on Holme’s part. Stephen Fry was a nice touch, but for those familiar with the Sherlock Holmes stories I fear the waterfall at the brother’s estate was a blatant foreshadowing of what was to come. Great period work, nice costuming and an enjoyable soundtrack to boot. Fun and entertaining, at least for me anyways…

[b]Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol

[/b]Great stunts, lots of gadgets and explosions. A surprising amount of humor though the running gag of the gadgets going wonky got kinda old… I found myself wondering if the company selling them there tech was the same one Willie Coyote uses :rolleyes:… But other than that it was a fun ride.

I haven’t seen this movie yet, but the star is Gina Carano, a fairly well known MMA fighter. That’s why the fight scenes look so authentic.

Aaaah, did not know that; thank you for that information. I wonder if some of her opponents in the film are also from MMA? Well I thought she had good screen presence and with a little work I think she she will come off even stronger acting-wise in her next film.

Granted, I have been hyping this one up a bit on the Legends cast…and I cannot say enough how happy I was with it. It was exactly what I expected, a fun, intense"real life" superhero movie. It was quite the awesome indeed. Check it out if you can

[b]Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance

[/b]This film had a very different feel and look from the first one. And Nicholas Cage was really enjoying playing someone on the verge of insanity, it was almost hard to watch. But if I had a demon in my head constantly struggling to free itself and wreak havoc on mankind I guess I would be nearly batshit crazy myself after a few months. Good pacing, nice performances, strong sound work and effective visual effects. The story was OK, and the ending was a little predicable but overall I found it enjoyable.

[b]Safehouse

[/b]Poor Ryan Reynolds had a hell of a time trying to look like a real actor opposite Denzel Washington. Action was good, the story was believable, but the red herrings never threw me. And the ending was forecast too well to be a surprise. But over all it was fun.

[b]The Grey

[/b]Good acting, good story, great location shooting. See it in a theater with good air conditioning and you will feel like you are there! :slight_smile: The CGI wolves however pulled me out of the movie time and again. Fortunately it seemed the director knew they would not be believable and so kept them to a minimum, thank God. An interesting foray into a wilderness survival experience, and what goes through a man’s mind when facing death straight on.

[b]The Woman in Black

[/b]Overall a fun scary flick. Saw the ending a mile away… so to speak. Interesting seeing David in something other than a Harry Potter flick. Had all the teenage girls screaming time and again, was almost worth it just to experience their screams… :slight_smile:

[b]Contraband

[/b]Meh.

[b]Red Tails

[/b]Far from accurate but full of great aerial action. I f you want accuraccy please see one of the many documenaries about the “Tuskegee Airmen”.

[b]The Secret World of Arrietty

[/b]While it is unfortunately not directed by Miyazaki it is still a gorgeous film, the look is very old school and the backgrounds are lush and highly detailed. It is just a joy to look at all the things that populate the ‘borrowers’ world, how all of their gadgets and furniture and so forth are made from items ‘borrowed’ from our world. The music is wonderful and the story touching, but I think it is far too slow and emotionally deep for children. I teared up alot and really enjoyed the ride. Well worth the year long wait for it to reach America. Thank you Disney for bringing it here.

[b]Act of Valor

[/b]If you are looking for a Hoo-Rah flag waving shoot-em-up look elsewhere. This film is so much more…

This is not about Patriotism, nor is it a propaganda piece to bump up recruitment numbers for the military. It is a salute to those who place themselves in harms way, we get to glimpse into their souls and understand why they do so day after day. It is about the brotherhood formed among men at arms. The camaraderie that grows among those who see battle together. And it is about dedication, professionalism, honor and sacrifice, tradition, heritage. Shit, I am tearing up just trying to write this, not simply because of the experience I had viewing the film but because of what happened after-wards.

It is in their genetic code, a sense of duty. To protect and to serve, to belong to something greater than yourself in order to better your society. To protect your family and those you love. It is not testosterone driven, it is a state of mind; seared into your soul… a ‘calling’ if you will. It is hard to explain if you have not felt it yourself. Those who feel the call often go into service as first responders, police, firemen and… yes; military. OK enough preaching, on to the movie.

Sure the acting was not great (They are warriors not actors) but the attitude was dead on. Weapons, tactics and techniques were as deadly accurate as the intelligence community will allow you to see. The cinematography was surprisingly beautiful for a military themed film, and they did not do long lingering beauty shots on the hardware which was nice. It would have seemed like a commercial if they had. The director gets accolades from me for that decision. This is not about the ‘tools of the trade’, this about the men and women who use the tools. The battle scenes are expertly shot and edited to give the sense of chaos which erupts under fire, squad commands, lingo and acronyms are barked out rapid fire without any explanation. Which was awesome, they figure if you are watching the film you know what the Hell they mean!:slight_smile: (another nice call)

The bad guys are not cookie cutter villains, nor are they evil monsters. Each has an agenda, or believable motivation which drives them.

The only thing I can liken this to is ‘We were Soldiers’. Though WWS is far better balanced in terms of showing both ‘fronts’, the battlefront and the home-front. How war effects both the soldier and the family left behind. Because when a soldier dies it is not just he who is effected, it is all those whose lives he touched. The emphasis on family helped personalize the characters motivations, because whenever America is mentioned during a briefing it is always referred to as ‘HOME’ or ‘back home’. Which makes things less ambiguous and more personal, and drives home the fact that they are fighting for more than ‘God and Country’ they are fighting for their families and loved ones. Their children’s futures. There may be flags on their uniforms but they are not ‘wrapped in them’, this is a personal fight. They are not just fighting for OUR America, they are fighting for THEIR America too.

Alright enough about all that, the next part is about the experience I had. If you do not wish to read about it I will understand not be offended, you may bounce on to the next post without guilt.

I showed up for the very first viewing in town. EARLY. I did not pay any attention to how many entered after-wards, I was attempting to catch up on old podcasts while waiting for the film and previews to begin. So I did not realize just how many had entered nor what kind of demographic had been attracted to the feature. I had however noticed (during the film) certain guffaws and snickers during moments only an insider should have gotten. And I also noticed a large number of ‘sniffs’ during emotional scenes. When the end of the film came there was applause, real applause. Which only made it even harder to stop crying, my eyes had teared up a great deal during the film (I guess a part of me needed it) and it took me quite a while to clean my face enough before I dared get up. When I did I was shocked by what I saw.

Everyone there was at least as old as me, most I would say were older than me (thats oooooold (as Sean would say)). And we ALL had red eyes from having cried, and after an awkward silent moment of looking around it soon became apparent we all shared the same look and the same realization. I am not the only one. There was something else we all shared, (Though it some time to sink in) we were all vets. It took a while but it all be came clear to us all, we stopped. It was dead quiet. I do not know how to say this other than, a lot was said without speaking. The one thing that kept going through my mind was… [b]I am not the only one.

[/b]As in: I am not the only one this effected… I am not the only one this reached out to. I am not the only one who ‘got it’. I not the only one who has known loss. I am not the only who, well you get the idea. We were all strangers and yet we all shared something in common. The cleaning crew fled when they found us all staring at one another, maybe they thought a fight was going to break out between the different branches! :smiley:

Maybe because were all strangers it was easier to let our guard down and let the pain show, and something which for some of us had been hidden a long time; the pride, after all when we were in it was not ‘cool.’ It was not accepted by society like it is now. The only time I had ever openly stated in public I was a vet was at the first Tea Party Rally in Phoenix, I did not feel ashamed of it there. And I was shocked at the positive response I received, and humbled by it. I had friends I had known for years that I never opened up to about my time in the service, you just don’t. That line that Spock uses in ST IV? Its true. Get over it McCoy.

Anyways some of us shook hands or clapped each other on the shoulder, most simply offered a knowing look, or a sad but proud nod. But we did not talk, after all that is just something you don’t do. It is just too hard, too personal. And like most I just had to stop by the ones in wheelchairs to shake their hands. Yes there were a few that would not make eye contact at all, and for those I felt deeply saddened. But overall it was a very cathartic and moving experience. One I never expected, nor shall likely have again.

If you slogged through this lengthy and blubbery post God Bless you and thank you for your time. And thank you GWC for offering a platform for venting this.

Thank you so much for sharing your experience, Omra. All this time you’ve been on the forum, I never realized you were a veteran.

Please allow me to say this: Thank you for your service. I’m moved and humbled by great gift that you, and all of our servicemen and servicewomen do for our country.

Lorax movie suxxxxxx. If you’re a fan of the book, the only reason to see it is cuz your kids want to. Here’s most of my tweet rant about it:

It grudgingly uses the book as pretense for a movie & story that roundly reject Seuss’ aesethic. I wish I could punch it.

Hacks behind Lorax movie were so busy stealing Pixar, mutilating Seuss+cramming their own sh*t in, they didn’t notice they’re not creative.

If you know the book, the Once-Ler as you know it is not in the Lorax movie; he’s been replaced by a character that is Some Random Dude.

Lorax movie jettisons Seuss’ gravity-defying, surreal visuals for a more realistic style. It’s a CARTOON, people. Understand your medium.

Producers prob’ly had a half-assed reason for it; “Oh, it doesn’t fit our style; we can’t DO that!” Uh, morons, it’s a movie. Yeah you can.

Dear Seuss Estate: It’s nice that you feel entitled to never work cuz your dad/grandad was talented, but please stop licensing movie adapt[ations]s.

…and don’t just take my word for it. New York Times’ AO Scott: “How the Grinch Stole Dr. Seuss… a noisy, useless piece of junk.” http://movies.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/movies/dr-seuss-the-lorax-with-ed-helms-and-danny-devito.html

I hope everyone goes and sees The Artist. I thought it was fantastic storytelling- all without words. The acting was amazing and I’m thrilled it won so many awards. Well worth your time.

I’m gonna see John Carter this weekend,
Who’s with me?
Anyone? Anyone?
I’ll get popcorn… with real butter!
sigh

I’ll let you know how it turns out…
By the way, if anyone collects Disney points when they buy the DVD/Movies, they are giving away 200 points for see JC.

I’m gonna watch it on Monday. Hope that Bryan Cranston and Michael Giacchino with his score will make it worthwhile.

Hmmmm
Review says John Carter is a mess…
It seems that people want this to fail more than be successful…
Well still gonna see it!

I cannot count the number of times movies that I greatly enjoyed were panned or even crucified by movie critics. No pack of snobbish media elites is going to keep me from this movie, I have waited a long time for an earnest movie treatment of this book series. I will be in the theater early Monday morning to see this without fail… :slight_smile:

Saw JC yesterday.
Would I see it again in the theatre?.. probably not
Would I put it in my movie collection as soon as it comes out?.. If the price is right.
It was not a wasted Sunday movie experience, a good start to the Sci fi / Fantasy movies this year.
Looking at the take for the weekend, 30 million in the States, 70 million the rest of the world, so 100 million against the 250 million spent.
Honestly though, I don’t see WHERE they spent that much money on it, maybe the sequels will be a bit lower.
I would like to see this movie profit so they continue the series.
Hopefully Disney won’t leave us hanging…

I saw John Carter as well and I did find it pretty enjoyable. The movie is very dense. It’s very high concept and they throw a lot of alien language at you, but the basic stuff is really easy to figure out. I thought it was going to be fairly light on the action since it’s a PG movie, but they really went for it. There’s quite a few intense scenes and I would say that it’s much closer to a PG13 movie, but Disney is always able to play down a rating so keep that in mind if you want to bring younger children. There was some wonky compositing in the graphics during some of the scenes but over all I found the graphics and 3D to be pretty good, especially when it came to that blue crystal wire stuff. The design work over all was quite pleasing to the eye. I liked the four armed orcs, and they did some interesting arm multitasking to make it more than just a visual gimmick. The ships were also quite interesting. I liked the combination of old mechanics and futuristic flying machine, it reminded me a lot of Escaflowne’s design.

Overall I’d say it’s definitely worth a watch, though I wouldn’t say a 3D screening is mandatory. Maybe a discount matinee viewing would be more appropriate. The general feeling is that this movie is right in that zone where if you go in ready to enjoy a wacky sci-fi adventure, you’ll enjoy it, but if you have apprehensions you probably won’t enjoy it. Just keep an open mind, don’t let yourself get bogged down in the minutia of the alien language, and enjoy it.

I left the office at noon Friday and took in this movie in the afternoon.

It was a pleasing “Swords and Planets” affair. It seemed to get bogged down in “politics and mysticism”, but when I set that aside, it was a fun and gorgeous flick :slight_smile:

I was a bit surprised that it cost $250M to make … /shrug

OB

[b]John Carter of Mars

[/b][SIZE=2]I found it a lush and beautiful movie at times, and while I am not a fan of Michael Giacchino’s music I found it competent and occasionally enriching. The costumes were a wonderful nod to the designs of Frank Frazzetta, (not a fan of the Martian swords, I preferred the long elegant rapiers and sabers that Frazzetta used in his art work but I can see why they went with the bulkier weapons instead) the Tharks were well done and the battle sequences were awesome. The acting was not great (hey, acting against a green screen would be a bitch for anyone…), but neither did it detract from the storytelling. The only obvious problem seemed to be with the pacing.

Which is understandable when you are introducing an audience to a new world with its own races, creatures, technology,language, customs, religion and politics. There were a few info dumps and so forth but they tried not to bog things down too much. And even with a 2 hour plus running time, there is still soooo much that is not even touched on.

Is it true to the original story? No, it varies a lot; but the spirit was there and the variations help with credibility in my opinion, especially in terms of character motivations and their agendas. There is a little humor to keep things from getting too dark or overwhelming. The new mechanics of how he gets to Mars is more believable than the original manner, and the new villains offer an opportunity for an on going challenge for Carter if new sequels prove a possibility.

The airships are gorgeous! I love them and the look of the technology and architecture. And the subtle way in which they made the natives red was a nice touch, it could have come off as silly if it had been over done. For a project that has been handed down from one team to another since 2006 it was not bad. Remember Star Trek the Motion Picture and Dune? Those films suffered much the same fate, being handed off from one production team to another, undergoing numerous changes. And those were a frakking mess…

All things considered I found this a worthy effort. If there is another film it will have the benefit of getting right to the point and not having to introduce everything. Which should help with the pacing and info dumping. I do not foresee a line of John Carter merchandise flooding the marketplace but I hope it makes enough money to warrant a sequel or two. I enjoyed the books as a teenager and would enjoy seeing them brought to life on the big screen.[/SIZE]

Awesome to hear! I can’t wait to see this one =)

[b]The Hunger Games

[/b][SIZE=2]The acting was pretty good considering the ages of the cast. Cinema-graphically it was pretty good, the Capitol city looked great and the costuming and sets were very nice. There was little to no gore, which was good considering the sheer horror of the subject matter. And the fight scenes were deliberately choppy and overly chaotic to mask what was going on, I assume this was to obscure the fact that these kids are not trained fighters and to keep the rating low enough to allow young adults (its main audience I suppose) to view the film.

All that seemed to be lacking for me were information and motivations. I am assuming that the background for the government in power and lands and districts was deliberately left out for political reasons, there is enough controversy around this film without stirring up even more trouble. But this only served to irritate me, I wanted to know about the war, and where this was all supposedly taking place, and the timeframe. Why were these districts being being repressed? And why would they allow it to happen? Why is it called 'The Hunger Games? For Frak’s sake at least explain that to me… Does the winning district get more rations for the year???

I found the main plot device to be stupid and illogical. How is this game supposed to keep order in this society? Wouldn’t watching your children going off to die incite riots? Using young children as gladiators makes no sense to me at all, this goes against all human nature. Trying to use the cruel and vicious death of innocent children as entertainment would create a political coupe and whip up moral outrage.

The audience is given the impression that somehow the game is supposed to incite a sense of hopelessness, and break the spirits of those in the ‘districts’, but in my mind it would do just the opposite. I just don’t understand this story’s sense of logic. And with the films flaunting of the oppressive government’s obscenely high level of technology; it made the need for this whole spectacle seem unnecessary, and the oppressive society which ran it even more inconceivable.

Rollerball (the original) made sense. Gladiator films I get. This I don’t get. Maybe the book explains it better…

[/SIZE]

Extremely disappointing that a good film that makes sense if you bother to pay attention to it (John Carter) was basically written off before it was even released, while what sounds like a confusing and somewhat incoherent film (Hunger Games) was basically a shoe-in to be a hit more or less as soon as it was announced. I’ve never read the books and have no interest in doing so (or seeing the film, IMO it’s just a minor step ahead of being one of those obsessed Twilight tweens, and I’m not an adolescent girl, so…) Maybe the books make more sense than the film; after all, most films are not as good as the books.

Did I think that John Carter was an Oscar-worthy effort? No, of course not; but I certainly thought it was at least as good as the first Pirates of the Caribbean and saw it twice. Sure, we know now what folks didn’t know about Mars back then - but if you haven’t already suspended disbelief before going to see it, then you might as well stay home, and its not as though they presented it in such a way that it stretches credulity. It was a good sci-fantasy adventure film that I thought did an above-average job of making the title character emotionally compelling. (Fighting off a horde of Green Martians to save the princess amidst flashbacks of burying his slain wife and child? That hit me in the chest, it did.) Plus the heroine was just as strongly developed as the hero (my new favorite character & actress - Lynn Collins as Dejah Thoris, by far!) I thought the updated storyline was an improvement over the somewhat simpler plot of the first book - it kept the essence of the original plot while expanding on some things and including elements from later books. I had no issues whatsoever with the effects & the design work was excellent, from the airships to the Tharks. It had action, drama, humor, and romance and the ending was poignant but satisfying. It’ll definitely be something I buy on DVD and hopefully, with enough word of mouth, it’ll do better in that market.