I know I have mentioned this elsewhere, but this is my favorite episode, with Objects in Space coming in a very close second.
This is an uncomprimising narrative…the lead character is bleeding to death from a stomach wound as we are introduced to the present, the recent past and the foundation of the relationships and the show itself.
I can go on and on about this show, but what I realized recently in thinking about how there is a fairly interesting split between those who are in the “Our Mrs. Reynolds/Trash/Shindig” camp and the “Objects in Space/Out of Gas” camp…what is interesting to me on reflection is that this is exactly what Battlestar doesn’t have. From a narrative perspective Battlestar is squarely in the “Objects in Space/Out of Gas” camp and only very occasionally goes to the “Our Mrs. Reynolds/etc” space.
In many ways I respect that. Battlestar is about the apocalypse of society and holocaust of humanity with an unrelenting enemy…not material that lends itself to a, “Everybody love Raymond” episode.
However, I think it is fairly clear from the ratings that over time people became tired of being smashed in the face with “everything is awful” over and over again. It raises an interesting question: Does BSG fail because it never compromised in providing gritty realistic stories? Is the artist creating the work for themself or their audience?
I know we all look back on the Blackbird episode and smile fondly as being the one exception to this. The question does stay with me…would BSG been more successful (and by success I mean reach and maintain a certain level of audience) if they had created more of a mix in their stories? I don’t mean influse slapstick, I mean bring back some humanity…bring back some humor, some hope.
In part this is why I love Out of Gas so much…the contrast it brings to the whole show. It deepens the story while reinforcing it. This is sci-fi at its best.