So what’s the theory?
whistler’s coming
OK, my theory:
The person on the bike, shooting at Alan/Abraham, was…
Sarah Connor, from the future. :eek:
in the words of Saul Tigh: whoa…
I really have to start questioning Sarah’s “Don’t call the cops and I’ll let you live” policy. There are way too many instances where things become far worse than they should be, only because she let a few people live. And the “Because Human Life Is Precious” argument doesn’t stand, because plenty of innocent people die all the time as a direct consequence of her actions.
I like that theory a lot. I like it so much, that I shall now accept it as truth.
Yeah. More probable than Jessie. It was obviously a sheila.
Did you mean Reese?
The thing I like the most about your theory: we’re all consistently ripping the decisions Sarah makes. We all think she’s just f**king up left and right. And, if future Sarah comes back to fix all the stuff present Sarah messed up, then it means we are right.
And of course, we all know that we’re always right. Therefore, it must be true.
Is he blindly driving the van?
no, sweetie. Buffy character. you are not of the Body and must be absorbed
Allowing Miles Dyson to die had a huge effect on the timing of Judgment Day. Clearly, letting the innocent die can only have a positive effect. 
If I were running the Skynet, and if my goal is to kill all humans, then I’m not sure I wanna kill Sarah. She’s giving me a pretty good head start on this “kill all humans” thing.
It just occurred to me that Sarah was present both times but clearly wasn’t the target. No one was shooting at Alan before she showed up, and she was the only other person who could possibly know where they’d be.
So did he know something that she didn’t want herself finding out? Or was Future Sarah trying to prevent the events that happened at the end of this episode?
Ah. Sorry Landru. Is it the Hour?
That’s an obscure one, D. I had to look him up.
Yeah, but she needs help. She can maneuver only so many innocent bystanders to their doom…
Yeah, I was wondering about that. I didn’t understand why Sarah clearly witnessed the shooter in both instance, but the shooter did nothing about that. Especially in the second and the fatal shooting, the killer had no way of knowing they’d go there unless they followed Sarah there. So, if you are fully aware that Sarah is just outside the house, why did the killer not go after Sarah next?
<burns>Excellent.</burns>
Because killing yourself in the past would be bad.