I had written a long reply, then I accidently erased it. Oops.
To skip over the bulk of it, I tried out Netflix, never got hooked, so I’ll probably just drop it altogther. Plus, half the time, it worked like this for me: http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/1FdFkq/follyandinnovation.com/2011/04/so-you-want-to-rent-a-movie/
And if you think people hate on Netflix, just look at Facebook every time they roll something new out there. There be haters hating.
Finally, I have a problem. I tend to dislike things that get heralded as great ‘art’. It’s actually caused some unwelcome social drama before in my life, and I would probably be better off if somebody could help me understand it better, or set me straight at least. I’ve never seen Citizen Kane (I saw it mentioned on the top 100 movies of the century list a few years back) and I have no real desire to. I’ve seen 2001: A Space Odyssey, and I regret it. I’m told these are great movies because of their artistic vision, or what they did for the genre, etc. but with 2001, I really saw a movie that was hard to follow and very slow. It may be because I’m 25 and grew up in an increasingly ADD world. At the same time, I don’t think of myself as somebody who has trouble understanding or following things, or has to have things spoonfed to them. I read Dune back in High School when anyone else I knew who had tried to get into it thought it was boring as hell (Ditto LotR, the Fellowship does drag a bit with history if you can’t get past it). I’ve even read the Silmarillion and followed it without getting confused. That being said, I couldn’t follow the grander arc of 2001. The bit in the middle with Hal made sense, but the connections between the other segments were much harder to follow, and the end of the movie just looked like one big acid trip to me. It was a great movie on portraying what they thought the real science of space travel and life would be, and I love the scene with the waitress transitioning around the cabin on the strip as they approach the space station in the beginning. I understand the book, which was written at the same time, makes things a lot more clear, but if you have to read the book to understand the movie, I think the movie was failing on one level somewhere along the way.
It doesn’t matter how much ‘meaning’ or ‘smarts’ the movie (or even book) has, if it can’t tell its story. That’s the reason I hate James Joyce, and I have no problem with saying I hate him. I spent a year teaching English to Chinese students at a university in China, and in a lit course I had to spend two weeks on Ulysses. The book is hard to follow, even if you know the language. It might be one of the greater pieces of literature of the 20th century, but Joyce himself said that scholars wouldn’t understand everything in it in a hundred years. It makes me feel he was kind of a dick.
I guess, in just my opinion, thing can be great ‘art’ or even have great ‘artistic significance,’ but unless they manage whatever their primary purpose was, I just can’t get behind it. This could also be why I don’t appreciate much abstract art…
But yeah, if anyone can explain things better to me, let me know, because I don’t really want to be a mindless hater.